Solution Architecture Practice

Comprehensive guide to software architecture frameworks, patterns, and best practices

View project on GitHub

Processes & Governance

Overview

This section documents the processes, workflows, and governance mechanisms that enable the Solution Architecture Practice to operate effectively and maintain quality standards.

Contents

Core Processes

Governance

Delivery Processes

Change Management

Communication

Quick Reference

I Need To…

Need Process Timeline
Get architecture guidance Engagement Model Same day - 3 days
Submit for ARB review ARB Process 1-2 weeks
Evaluate new technology Technology Evaluation 2-8 weeks
Request an exception Exception Management 1-2 weeks
Get help with design Engagement Model 3 days - ongoing
Understand standards Standards & Compliance Reference doc

Common Workflows

Starting a New Project

  1. Review Engagement Model
  2. Submit architecture service request
  3. Initial architecture consultation
  4. Follow Solution Design Lifecycle
  5. Submit to ARB for review
  6. Implement with architecture support

Making a Significant Architecture Decision

  1. Document options and trade-offs
  2. Create ADR
  3. Get peer architect review
  4. Present to ARB if required
  5. Communicate decision to stakeholders

Adopting New Technology

  1. Follow Technology Evaluation Process
  2. Create evaluation document
  3. Run proof of concept
  4. Present findings to Architecture Council
  5. Get approval for adoption
  6. Document in technology radar

Process Principles

Keep It Simple

  • Processes should enable, not impede
  • Minimize bureaucracy
  • Focus on value-added activities

Be Flexible

  • Tailor process to project size and risk
  • Allow for expedited reviews when appropriate
  • Adapt based on feedback

Maintain Quality

  • Don’t compromise on critical reviews
  • Ensure adequate peer review
  • Document decisions thoroughly

Be Transparent

  • Clear criteria and expectations
  • Visible status and timelines
  • Open communication

Continuous Improvement

  • Regular process retrospectives
  • Collect and act on feedback
  • Benchmark against industry practices
  • Evolve processes based on learnings

Process Ownership

Architecture Review Board (ARB)

  • Owner: Director of Solution Architecture
  • Members: Principal Architects, Domain Experts
  • Cadence: Weekly
  • Purpose: Review and approve significant architecture decisions

Architecture Council

  • Owner: Director of Solution Architecture
  • Members: All architects
  • Cadence: Monthly
  • Purpose: Knowledge sharing, standards review, community building

Technology Evaluation Committee

  • Owner: Principal Architects
  • Members: Domain experts, interested architects
  • Cadence: As needed
  • Purpose: Evaluate and approve new technologies

Standards Working Group

  • Owner: Rotating Principal Architect
  • Members: Architects from each domain
  • Cadence: Quarterly
  • Purpose: Review and update architecture standards

Process Metrics

We measure process effectiveness through:

Cycle Time

  • Time from request to initial response
  • Time from submission to ARB decision
  • Time for technology evaluations

Quality

  • Defect rates in architecture-reviewed systems
  • Technical debt in new systems
  • Security findings in reviewed systems

Satisfaction

  • Stakeholder satisfaction with process
  • Architecture team satisfaction
  • Process compliance rate

Efficiency

  • Process overhead (% of project time)
  • Review meeting efficiency
  • Documentation completeness

Getting Help with Processes

Questions About Processes

  • Slack: #architecture-processes
  • Email: solution-architecture@company.com
  • Office Hours: Daily architecture office hours

Process Improvement Suggestions

  • Submit via Architecture Council
  • Email to practice leadership
  • Discuss in retrospectives

Training on Processes

  • New architect onboarding covers all processes
  • Quarterly process refresher training
  • Self-paced process guides (this documentation)

Back to Home